by Gary Slatko
October 15th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are some interesting aspects in the guidance for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the fifth in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first four articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS, an overview of a REMS submission and greater detail about the “Proposed REMS” and “REMS Supporting Document”, and REMS submissions and communications with FDA.
In this fifth and final article, we address our preliminary interpretation of the draft guidance, as well as opportunities for industry to respond and propose further improvements. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Gary Slatko
October 13th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the fourth in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first three articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS, an overview of a REMS submission and greater detail about the “Proposed REMS”, and “REMS Supporting Document” components of the REMS document submission. This article covers the section of the guidance about “REMS assessment and modification submissions” and “communicating with FDA”. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Gary Slatko
October 7th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the third in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first two articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS relative to RiskMAPs and those RiskMAPs deemed to be REMS, an overview of a REMS submission, and greater detail about the more concise “proposed REMS” component of the REMS document submission. This article details the content of the more comprehensive “REMS Supporting Document”, which explains the rationale for, and supporting information about, the proposed REMS. A template for the REMS Supporting Document can be found on the www.fda.gov website. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Gary Slatko
October 5th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past two years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the second in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first article covered the background of FDAAA and REMS relative to RiskMAPs and those RiskMAPs deemed to be REMS, as well as an overview of a REMS submission. This second article addresses, in greater detail, the more concise “proposed REMS” component of the REMS document submission. The more expanded “REMS supporting document”, explaining the rationale for, and supporting information about, the proposed REMS being addressed in the next article. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Gary Slatko
September 30th, 2009
FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”, on September 30. While much of the guidance is codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past two years, there are a few surprises (indicated here in bold) for all of us working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the first in a series of blog posts about this important document. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Jeff Fetterman
September 24th, 2009
Description of RxFMEA™
RxFMEA™ is a proprietary modification and extension of the basic FMEA methodology and that of Healthcare FMEA (HFMEA™), an adaptation of FMEA that was developed by the U.S. Veteran’s Administration. My review of the process suggests that the objective of RxFMEA™ is the comprehensive management of risks in the pharmaceutical industry. Because of the active involvement of trained personnel and untrained consumers in the distribution and use of pharmaceuticals, RxFMEA™ extends the basic FMEA and HFMEA™ processes in the following ways Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Jeff Fetterman
September 3rd, 2009
Airplanes and medications seem like items that don’t mix well. In fact, the discussion of a recent webinar suggests otherwise, at least as it relates to risk management. Captain Ben Berman shared experiences from his role as former Chief of Major Investigations of the U.S. National Transportation Board in which he served as a member of the major accident go-team responsible for safety studies about flight crew human factors. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Marc DeLuca
September 2nd, 2009
In a constantly changing regulatory environment, having a well planned contingency strategy is vital for successful Food and Drug Administration (FDA) negotiations. Today, this is more important than ever. The FDA is asking companies to prepare Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) to help ensure patient safety, and has issued a documentation template, but has yet to provide further guidance to the industry on how such REMS should be developed. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Pharmaceuticals, REMS | Comments Off
by Jeff Fetterman
August 19th, 2009
Guest Blog by Dr. Michael Benjamin
Dr. Jenkins–
I have seen your recent comments on providing REMS programs for opioids. Since you are the director of OND, I was hoping to give you some feedback on these programs, and to alert you to the adverse effect on patient care that they can have.
I am a clinical hematologist and oncologist. I have to contend with many drugs under these programs, including Promacta, Nplate, Thalomid, Tysabri, and Revlimid. Looks like opioids are next on the list. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
by Jeff Fetterman
August 12th, 2009
Your company wouldn’t launch a new product and wait for the end-of-year results before assessing whether the launch strategy was effective, correct? In fact, the process most pharmaceutical product managers employ includes weekly measurement of prescription volume, tracking product inventory, assessing distribution patterns of promotional materials, measuring knowledge/attitude/practices of prescribers, and adjusting marketing activities to achieve success.
So why would tracking and adjusting risk management activities be any different? FDA requires an assessment of REMS performance at intervals no less frequently than 18 months, 3 years, and 7 years post launch. What are you doing before and between formal assessments to actively manage and maximize the effectiveness of the REMS? Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
