Posts Tagged ‘Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy’
Wednesday, May 26th, 2010
Sponsors are struggling with how to adapt research survey methods to meet the regulatory reporting standards of REMS assessments. Assessments need to be designed in a way that measure risk mitigation. Reports and interpretation of findings are highly qualitative and declarations of success may be inconsistent with those findings.
REMS assessments should be designed in a meaningful manner for measuring specific objectives. It’s important to start with a rational design – balance the interests of regulators, customers, and manufacturers. The design should be evidence-based and include end users in the design process. (more…)
Tags: FDA draft guidance, ParagonRx, patient safety, REMS, REMS assessment, REMS elements, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy
Posted in Appropriate Use, REMS | No Comments »
Monday, April 26th, 2010
The REMS Coordination Office (RCO) is the organizing hub among a Sponsor’s cross-functional team. The RCO is responsible for coordinating and tracking various aspects of REMS and the activities of outside service providers. The RCO features a core team of individuals tasked with managing REMS activities and processes.
This was the topic of a recent webinar hosted by ParagonRx. Jeff Fetterman, ParagonRx President, opened the webinar by borrowing two examples from the nuclear industry to illustrate how two different principles for organizing operational processes and systems have the potential for two different outcomes - flawless or disastrous. (more…)
Tags: Jeff Fetterman, ParagonRx, REMS, REMS effectiveness, REMS implementation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, risk management, risk mitigation
Posted in REMS, Tweets | No Comments »
Tuesday, March 30th, 2010
- Guest blog by Andrea J. Simon, PhD -
This blog by Andrea Simon, PhD, a corporate anthropologist, is one in a series that ParagonRx has initiated to help our readers better understand some of the trends taking place in the field of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) and risk management under the FDA draft guidance. We know you will find them of value and encourage you to comment on them.
In April, ParagonRx is hosting its Wednesday FoREMS webinar on the topic of organizing to effectively manage Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS). And, in May, the Wednesday FoREMS will host a panel of industry leaders discussing how their organizations are building REMS capabilities and resourcing them in their product development and commercialization functions. In preparation for these upcoming webinars, I thought I would share with you some of my observations from the field and encourage you to share your own company’s perspectives on how you are reorganizing to create and effectively manage REMS. (more…)
Tags: appropriate use, communication plan, contingency plan, draft guidance, Elements to Assure Safe Use, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, guidance, NDA, ParagonRx, regulatory, REMS, REMS approval, REMS development, REMS effectiveness, REMS implementation, REMS program, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, risk management, risk mitigation
Posted in General, REMS | No Comments »
Thursday, October 15th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are some interesting aspects in the guidance for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the fifth in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first four articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS, an overview of a REMS submission and greater detail about the “Proposed REMS” and “REMS Supporting Document”, and REMS submissions and communications with FDA.
In this fifth and final article, we address our preliminary interpretation of the draft guidance, as well as opportunities for industry to respond and propose further improvements. (more…)
Tags: approval, benefit-risk, EASU, Elements to Assure Safe Use, evidence-based, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, guidance, medication, medication guide, NDA, Proposed REMS, REMS, REMS assessment, REMS design, REMS development, REMS effectiveness, REMS elements, REMS guidance, REMS program, REMS supporting document, risk assessment, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, risk management, RiskMAP, submission
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
Tuesday, October 13th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the fourth in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first three articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS, an overview of a REMS submission and greater detail about the “Proposed REMS”, and “REMS Supporting Document” components of the REMS document submission. This article covers the section of the guidance about “REMS assessment and modification submissions” and “communicating with FDA”. (more…)
Tags: approval, approved REMS, biologics, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, generic drug, guidance, Proposed REMS, regulatory, REMS, REMS assessment, REMS document, REMS elements, REMS guidance, REMS supporting document, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, submission
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
Wednesday, October 7th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past 2 years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the third in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first two articles covered the background of FDAAA and REMS relative to RiskMAPs and those RiskMAPs deemed to be REMS, an overview of a REMS submission, and greater detail about the more concise “proposed REMS” component of the REMS document submission. This article details the content of the more comprehensive “REMS Supporting Document”, which explains the rationale for, and supporting information about, the proposed REMS. A template for the REMS Supporting Document can be found on the www.fda.gov website. (more…)
Tags: approval, EASU, Elements to Assure Safe Use, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, guidance, medication, medication guide, Proposed REMS, regulatory, REMS, REMS approval, REMS assessment, REMS document, REMS elements, REMS supporting document, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, risk management, RiskMAP, safety, submission
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
Monday, October 5th, 2009
On September 30th, FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”. While much of this draft guidance is a codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past two years, there are a few interesting surprises (depicted in bold below) for those working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the second in an ongoing series of blog articles about this important document.
Our first article covered the background of FDAAA and REMS relative to RiskMAPs and those RiskMAPs deemed to be REMS, as well as an overview of a REMS submission. This second article addresses, in greater detail, the more concise “proposed REMS” component of the REMS document submission. The more expanded “REMS supporting document”, explaining the rationale for, and supporting information about, the proposed REMS being addressed in the next article. (more…)
Tags: communication plan, EASU, Elements to Assure Safe Use, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, guidance, medication, medication guide, NDA, Proposed REMS, REMS, REMS assessment, REMS document, REMS elements, REMS supporting document, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, RiskMAP, safety, submission
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 30th, 2009
FDA issued its long awaited draft guidance, “Format and Content of Proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), REMS Assessments and Proposed REMS Modifications”, on September 30. While much of the guidance is codification of what’s already been happening in practice over the past two years, there are a few surprises (indicated here in bold) for all of us working in the REMS space to contemplate. This is the first in a series of blog posts about this important document. (more…)
Tags: approved REMS, communication plan, deemed REMS, EASU, Elements to Assure Safe Use, FDA Guidance, FDAAA, guidance, medication, medication guide, NDA, Proposed REMS, regulatory, REMS, REMS assessment, REMS document, REMS guidance, REMS supporting document, risk evaluation, Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, risk management, RiskMAP, safety, submission
Posted in FDA Guidance, Pharmaceuticals, REMS | No Comments »
